http://rantless.net/2006/07/10/cleanflicks-and-droit-dauteur/ Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:27:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3 http://rantless.net/2006/07/10/cleanflicks-and-droit-dauteur/#comment-4 Tue, 11 Jul 2006 17:56:12 +0000 http://rantless.net/2006/07/10/cleanflicks-and-droit-dauteur/#comment-4 [...] CleanFlicks continued. I see that Public Knowledge is blogging about moral rights and the CleanFlicks decision today.  Tim Schneider asked in a question to my first post on this whether stricter European copyright laws are justified out of moral rights. I’m not sure if that’s historically true, but a system that derives copyright from some moral or intrinsic right of the creator is bound to be far stricter than one that derives copyright as a type of monopoly subsidy in support of a social policy. [...] […] CleanFlicks continued. I see that Public Knowledge is blogging about moral rights and the CleanFlicks decision today.  Tim Schneider asked in a question to my first post on this whether stricter European copyright laws are justified out of moral rights. I’m not sure if that’s historically true, but a system that derives copyright from some moral or intrinsic right of the creator is bound to be far stricter than one that derives copyright as a type of monopoly subsidy in support of a social policy. […]

]]> http://rantless.net/2006/07/10/cleanflicks-and-droit-dauteur/#comment-3 Tue, 11 Jul 2006 16:13:00 +0000 http://rantless.net/2006/07/10/cleanflicks-and-droit-dauteur/#comment-3 Hmm, I'm new to copyright generally, but don't the Europeans use moral rights to justify a much stricter copyright protection regime? Hmm, I’m new to copyright generally, but don’t the Europeans use moral rights to justify a much stricter copyright protection regime?

]]>